Appeal: J. A. v. Dept of Licensing, Case No. 09-2-44999-6 SEA.
Court Rejects Claim Implied Consent Warning Misleading Because Issue Was Not Raised at Hearing. A King County Superior Court judge has rejected a driver's claim he was misled by the implied consent warning because he was a commercial driver. While the judge was troubled by the wording of the warning given to commercial drivers, she ultimately ruled against the driver because his driver failed to argue the issue before the DOL hearing examiner.
Practice area(s): Appeals